Article 13 of the Indian Constitution

Article 13 of the Indian Constitution: Laws Inconsistent with Fundamental Rights

Introduction

Article 13 of the Indian Constitution is a crucial provision that ensures the supremacy of Fundamental Rights. It mandates that any law inconsistent with Fundamental Rights shall be void. This article serves as a protector of individual rights by preventing the State from making laws that violate the Fundamental Rights enshrined in Part III of the Constitution.

---

Text of Article 13

Laws inconsistent with or in derogation of the fundamental rights

(1) All laws in force in the territory of India immediately before the commencement of this Constitution, in so far as they are inconsistent with the provisions of this Part, shall, to the extent of such inconsistency, be void.

(2) The State shall not make any law which takes away or abridges the rights conferred by this Part, and any law made in contravention of this clause shall, to the extent of the contravention, be void.

(3) In this article, unless the context otherwise requires,—

• (a) “law” includes any ordinance, order, bye-law, rule, regulation, notification, custom, or usage having the force of law;
• (b) “laws in force” includes laws passed or made by a Legislature or other competent authority before the commencement of this Constitution and not previously repealed.

(4) Nothing in this article shall apply to any amendment of this Constitution made under Article 368.

---

Key Features of Article 13

1. Declares Pre-Constitution Laws Void if They Violate Fundamental Rights

• Laws that existed before 26th January 1950 (when the Constitution came into force) and are inconsistent with Fundamental Rights shall be void.
• Example: Untouchability was abolished, and any laws supporting caste-based discrimination were declared unconstitutional.

2. Prohibits the State from Making New Laws that Violate Fundamental Rights

• No new law can be created by Parliament or State Legislatures that takes away or limits Fundamental Rights.
• Example: If a law restricts freedom of speech unfairly, it can be challenged under Article 13.

3. Broad Definition of 'Law'

• Article 13 includes all types of laws, such as:
  • Acts passed by Parliament and State Legislatures
  • Ordinances issued by the President or Governor
  • Rules and regulations made by the government
  • Customs and traditions with legal recognition

4. Constitutional Amendments and Article 13

• Article 13(4) clarifies that constitutional amendments under Article 368 are not considered laws under Article 13.

---

Types of Laws Covered Under Article 13

Type of Law	Examples
Legislative Acts	Parliament or State Legislature Laws
Executive Orders	Presidential Ordinances, Government Notifications
Customs & Traditions	Practices recognized legally before the Constitution
Rules & Regulations	Laws made by administrative bodies (e.g., RBI Guidelines)

---

Judicial Interpretations of Article 13

1. Keshavananda Bharati Case (1973)

• The Supreme Court ruled that constitutional amendments cannot violate the 'Basic Structure' of the Constitution.

2. Golaknath Case (1967)

• The Court held that Parliament cannot amend Fundamental Rights.

3. Minerva Mills Case (1980)

• Declared that Parliament’s power to amend the Constitution is limited, and laws violating Fundamental Rights can be struck down.

4. Maneka Gandhi Case (1978)

• Strengthened the interpretation of personal liberty under Article 21 and ensured that all laws comply with Fundamental Rights.

---

Why Is Article 13 Important?

1. Protects Citizens’ Rights

• Prevents arbitrary laws that infringe on individual liberties.

2. Ensures Judicial Review

• Courts can strike down unconstitutional laws under Article 13.

3. Maintains Constitutional Supremacy

• Prevents Parliament from enacting laws that override Fundamental Rights.

4. Checks Government Power

• The judiciary can review laws and executive actions to ensure they comply with Fundamental Rights.

---

Limitations of Article 13

1. Constitutional Amendments Are Excluded

• Parliament can amend Fundamental Rights using Article 368, which limits the scope of Article 13.

2. Interpretation Challenges

• Courts must decide whether a law violates Fundamental Rights, which can lead to conflicting judgments.

3. No Retrospective Effect

• Article 13 applies only from the date of the Constitution’s commencement. Past laws were void only from 1950, not before.

---

Conclusion

Article 13 is a cornerstone of Fundamental Rights, ensuring that no law violates the Constitution’s core principles. It empowers the judiciary to review laws and protect individual rights. By preventing the State from making unconstitutional laws, Article 13 upholds the spirit of democracy and justice.